Connections: Jean François Bauret and Jeff Koons

(Last Updated On June 25, 2022)

If one is an avid collector of artistic images, then he or she is bound to stumble across things that seem connected somehow.  This is how I discovered the Fränzi Fuhrmann connection among the German Expressionist painters known Die Brücke. So, one day I happened to recognize that an image I had in my collection of a Jeff Koons sculpture closely resembled a photograph I also had in my collection.  With a little bit of searching I discovered it was a photo by Jean François Bauret, though not having a title for the photo to confirm it, I am not even certain it is a Bauret photo.  I have not been able to find it anywhere else on the internet, and that is a problem.  With rare pieces like this I prefer to find at least two versions of it correctly labeled so that I am not just repeating someone else’s error (if an error was made.)  Pictures of the Koons sculpture, however, are more readily available on the internet.

Now, with regard to the Bauret photo, ordinarily I would not post images with such flimsy credit information, or at least not as labeled.  I might list them under the ‘Artist Unknown’ marker.  But in this case the mystery confounds me enough that I am posting both of these in the hope that someone out there might have more accurate information and/or a higher quality version of the photo.  In any case it is quite clear to me that Koons ripped off Bauret’s photo, or maybe Bauret took the photo for Koons to model his sculpture on.  Who knows?  One is hard-pressed to find any real connection between these two artists though.  Jean François Bauret is a classic art photographer who began his career in the 1950s.  His portraiture is pared down and elegant, his nudes very tasteful.  By contrast, Jeff Koons is a postmodern pop artist in the vein of Andy Warhol, and his work is either a critique of pop culture or a shameless wallowing in it; critics are split on this.  He has also used blatantly pornographic images in his work.  Not that I am against porn, even as art, but Koons’ poppy, lowbrow aesthetic I think actually accentuates the trashiness of porn rather than lifting it out of its perceived trashiness.  So what exactly is the connection here?

First, let’s look at the Koons sculpture.  Although it is difficult to tell in photos where it is usually placed against a white background, Naked is actually life-sized, its height just under four feet (45.5 inches to be exact, or around 116 centimeters if you’re on the metric system.)  But the most ironic thing about it is that it is part of a series called Banality.  Essentially a postmodern commentary on kitschy but high-end objets d’art, I can see where Koons was coming from by including it there, even if I don’t necessarily agree with his assessment; however, this was created in the mid 1980s, a bit before the moral panic over child pornography really set in, and nude children in art have since become anything but banal in many people’s eyes.

Jeff Koons – Naked (1985) (1)

Jeff Koons – Naked (1985) (2)

Jeff Koons – Naked (1985) (3)

Jeff Koons – Naked (1985) (4)

And now, here’s the photo from which the sculpture was obviously inspired.

Jean François Bauret – (Title Unknown)

Since I’m already posting a Bauret photo, I might as well post a couple more that fit the blog’s theme.  The first one is a portrait of late actor Klaus Kinski holding a small girl.  The little girl’s name is Nanoï and does not appear to be of any relation to Kinski.  I cannot find any information about her at all, so I am going to assume she was placed in the photo simply for the sake of contrast.

Edit: As I believed the child was actually a girl, I did not happen to look up the info on Klaus Kinski’s son Nikolai, but on a hunch I checked it just today.  Ladies and gents, we have a winner.  Nanhoï is in fact Nanhoï Nikolai Kinski, Klaus’s son.  You can definitely see the family resemblance here.  My confusion over this stemmed from the fact that I have never heard or read of him referred to by his first name, only by his middle name, Nikolai.  Anyway, even though it is a boy I am going to leave the image up, as I find it to be rather charming.

Jean François Bauret – Klaus Kinski & Nanoï (1979)

The cover of a photo book about twins.  The French have two words for twins, depending on gender: ‘jumeau’ (plural ‘jumeaux’) refers to a male twin and ‘jumelle’ (plural ‘jumelles’) to a female twin; hence, the title . . .

Jean François Bauret – Jumeaux & Jumelles (cover)

Jeff Koons (official site)

Wikipedia: Jeff Koons

Jean François Bauret (official site)

Wikipedia: Jean François Bauret (text in French)

10 thoughts on “Connections: Jean François Bauret and Jeff Koons

  1. Hi, it is interesting to know that maybe you were the curator that first saw the connections between this two pieces, and well personally now that this all got out as plagiarism, well, it think it is nice to be recognized as the ones that gave the willow the information to have a case against Koons, thank you.

    • As a matter of fact, it was not Pip that first recognized the plagiarism. Perhaps he was the first to do an article on it. The wheels of justice turn slowly so even though the court case was in preparation, it had not progressed much at the time of the article and there may not, as yet, been any press releases from any of the parties involved.

  2. Matters of language and words never cease to fascinate me, maybe a little too much, but:
    The name of that boy appears here as both Nanoi and Nanhoi.
    (Oh, and the Vietnam War era is now flooding back on me. LOL)
    Anyway, I was just wondering which was correct.

    P.S. It was very good judgement to decide to keep the picture up.
    I always say that little girls and little boys are equally beautiful.

  3. Today’s Guardian (10/03/17) has a piece about Bauret’s family being paid £35,000 damages by Koons and the Pompidou Centre – not mentioning Pip’s key rôle in the events. I sent a complaint, giving this article as a reference, but I’m sure no-one’s going to publish a follow-up to add the information…..oh well, at least I hope the widow gets in touch to signal her appreciation….

    • A humorous side-note:
      When I first saw your post, I wondered:
      What? October 3rd? Of THIS year?
      Then I remembered that in most countries dates are written
      in “dd/mm/yy” style.
      Here in the U.S. we use the “mm/dd/yy” style,
      so today would be 03/10/17, or just 3/10/17.

      (This is of course NOT a criticism.)
      It’s a little bit like soccer/football, elevator/lift or diapers/nappies.

  4. Searching for current contact info for M. Bauret, regarding an earlier correspondence from 1990 about the photo Deux Enfants. Very interesting to have stumbled on this theme of the Koons pieces!

      • I am very interested by what I saw about Jean-François Bauret on your blog. Jf Bauret is my husband and he did all the photos you are showing, I have all the documentation you need about them.
        My husband passed away a week ago, the funerals were yesterday. He would have been very interested to see what Jeff Koon did after his photos, and perhaps upset neither being informed, nor giving any approbation for such a literal copy.
        At least I am very surprised, and I appreciate that you noticed this interesting thing. I had never see these peaces from Jeff Koon.
        Please, take contact with me on my email.
        We keep in touch.

        • Bonjour, mon ami.

          Well, first off, I am sorry to hear that he has passed away. My condolences. Secondly, I am quite shocked to learn that Koons has apparently ripped off Bauret’s image without compensating him, or even without his knowledge, apparently! Wow, I do not know what to say to that. I will email you, though I am not sure I can be of much assistance.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.